User talk:Nutshinou

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nutshinou!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:22, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

???

[edit]

Why do you want to delete my File:Spongebob imagination.jpg image? I had modified the image slightly by cropping it and after all, it is a meme. So it is for public use. This makes no sense.

However, I am not forcing you not to nominate it for deletion. It is for the public after all.

Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contact me on Wikipedia! Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctorine Dark (talk • contribs) 12:23, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctorine Dark (talk • contribs) 12:24, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the best at explaining so here's an official policy that would perhaps your question (also, something being a meme does not mean it isn't under copyright anymore), though if you have anything against that you should probably say something on the deletion request entry --Nutshinou Talk! 14:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

monche

[edit]

tu est gentil

COM:SELFIE

[edit]

Hi. Thanks for nominating selfies for deletion. In future, you can nominate them for speedy deletion under F10 - personal photos by non contributors. {{CSD|F10}} Thanks Gbawden (talk) 11:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. I'm not used to speedy deletions yet but I'll try doing this next time --Nutshinou Talk! 11:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Dronebogus (talk) 13:17, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zambia - Location Map (2011) - ZMB - UNOCHA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

182.2.170.253 11:50, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Western Sahara - Location Map (2013) - ESH - UNOCHA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Heraldrist (talk) 07:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you aswellǃ --Nutshinou Talk! 10:59, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful when making categories hidden

[edit]

Dear Nutshinou, I noticed that today you made some categories "hidden categories". But if you do so, the files in them, will get the category "Media needing categories as of ..." if they have no regular category. And that was exactly the reason why all these files are put into a category "to be categorised", like Category:RAA images Den Helder 1905-1940 to be categorised. So please do not do so anymore, unless you are absolutely sure that it won't do any harm. JopkeB (talk) 13:59, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But if they are placed in this category, they are counted as "categorized" even though they should not be (because they need to be categorized)? This is the reason why these categories should be hidden instead of being regular categories Nutshinou Talk! 18:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But then you should do something about the progam/code that adds automatically a category "Media needing categories as of ..." to files with no regular categories, to make an exception for files with hidden categories with "to be categorised" in the title. Until that problem is fixed, I propose to stop adding "hidden categories" to these categories. --JopkeB (talk) 02:15, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not necessarily, the files are not categorized (other than a maintenance category), so they should go into the "Media needing categories as of" categories, and if the files gets categorized, they should be removed from both categories (like all the other hidden categories that contain files "to be categorized") Nutshinou Talk! 11:31, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But that is the whole point: we (at least I) do not want hundreds or thousands of files, all about one broad subject, to be in a category "Media needing categories as of ...", which is very general. We do not want other people to bother about categorising these file, but only the uploader and people who he/she is working with. That is why we park these files in an intermediate-category like Category:RAA images Den Helder 1905-1940 to be categorised. --JopkeB (talk) 15:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Argiope gallicus.jpg

Did you ever see a winged spider? I didn't before and I am quite shure thas someone photoshopped wings and abdomen from some wasp on the body and legs of a spider. Kersti (talk) 16:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my bad, only now I notice that detail and the usage of this file on other wikis Nutshinou Talk! 17:57, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Use of time

[edit]

can you spend your time on things better than eating images 82.3.101.179 00:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This rename request has been declined for reason 2 in Criteria to decline. The original image name is French and means "Bordes-Uchentein-clay" where Bordes-Uchentein is a region of France. The decline extends to the other 09062-Bordes-Uchentein-xxx files as well.

Thank you for your suggestion and please continue to recommend files that require renaming. Epolk (talk) 23:31, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Files from Flickr (uncategorized 2022) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ooligan (talk) 18:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Files_from_Flickr_(uncategorized_2013) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ooligan (talk) 18:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Files from Flickr (uncategorized 2012) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ooligan (talk) 18:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Files from Flickr (uncategorized 2011) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ooligan (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Files from Flickr (uncategorized 2010) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ooligan (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Files from Flickr (uncategorized 2009) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ooligan (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

i love you

Imabathbomb (talk) 20:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests

[edit]

Hi, You need a proof to nominate a file for speedy deletion. Files like File:Partenza Race for the Cure 2023.jpg are most probably the uploader's work, so they are not eligible for speedy deletion. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for letting me know. What I found weird is that in the metadata of this file, the "Copyright holder" field reads "Paola Capparella" (which doesn't correspond with the uploader's username), this is not the case for the other files uploaded by said user (with all of them also having varying/inconsistent metadata). Nutshinou Talk! 18:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The speedy criteria is reasonable strict and exact duplicate does NOT include other file types.  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thank you, will avoid any similar speedy nominations in the future. -- Nutshinou Talk! 12:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi, I just seen you put the image I published as it has copyright, I’m new at Wikipedia so sorry if I did something wrong, how I could delete the photo so it not cause more problems? LOPEZwas (talk) 15:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, no worries, the image should be deleted shortly as I already tagged it appropriately. -- Nutshinou Talk! 17:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Group photograph at Tennoji Miyako Hotel in Dec 2010.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


The reason given by the user who added this tag is: How is this ineligible for copyright?

Sinigh (talk) 15:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"I find Commons making it very easy to host and fabricate hoaxes most unfortunate (e.g. uploading fictitious flags and adding them to a sparsely populated place where no one will see/check.)"

[edit]

I feel like the only way to solve this issue would be to bring it up on Meta. There is little Commons can do about it Trade (talk) 14:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Files_from_Flickr_(uncategorized_2014) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please reread this guidance. Admins cannot speedy delete items in use for supposed advertising, they need a DR.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These aren't in use per COM:INUSE ("An otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely [...] because it is in use on a user page (the "User:" namespace)") but sure, I'll open a deletion request for such cases. Nutshinou Talk! 23:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, seems like it was a mistake on your part (no other sysops consider spam not to be eligible for speedy deletion even if it's used on the uploader's userpage, per aforementioned policy) and since I'm opening a considerable number of deletion requests, I'm going to stop Nutshinou Talk! 17:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Francesco Graziani, Fiorentina.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Günther Frager (talk) 15:10, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]